Province Provides Covid-19 Grants to Municipalities

In May, Council had a special meeting to discuss the impact of Covid-19 on the Town’s budget.   A report by Treasurer (and interim CAO) Ian Davey said that there would be a shortfall in revenue of $1,561,000.  However, he also said that this could be compensated for so that the Town would not have a significant financial problem – see links below.  This assumed that the crisis would last for no more than 6 months – that is, that the last 3 months of the year would be business as usual.  County Council was also expecting a drop in revenue and as well were trying to limit the impact on citizens by directing staff to have a goal of a zero tax increase for 2021.

Ian Davey
Ian Davey

But it’s generally agreed that at least some impact of Covid-19 will last longer than 6 months and there are additional expenses not included in first estimates. These include free transit, free parking, PPE costs and as well as significant recovery costs.  Since municipalities are not allowed to have a budgeted deficit, the only way for Municipalities to cope would be a grant from the Province – and that’s what was announced today.

In July, the Federal Government announced they would give $19B to Provinces to help with restarting (Safe Restart Agreement).  Ontario got $4B of this and today MPP David Piccini announced that his Riding would get $5.1M with 50% coming from the Federal grant.

But trying to work out exactly how much to give each Municipality would be impossible so the Province has decided to provide grants based simply on “households”.

For the local riding of Northumberland Peterborough South, here are the numbers (Northumberland only):

  • Township of Alnwick/Haldimand, $207,600
  • Municipality of Brighton, $326,600
  • Town of Cobourg, $571,800 and an additional $97,780 to support transit operations
  • Township of Cramahe, $174,600 and an additional $16,922 to support transit operations
  • Township of Hamilton, $300,200
  • Municipality of Port Hope, $451,400 and an additional $54,807 to support transit operations
  • Municipality of Trent Hills, $440,600 and an additional $17,436 to support transit operations
  • County of Northumberland, $2,472,900

Note that this funding is described as “part of the first round of emergency funding under the Safe Restart Agreement.”

The County is also receiving $1,397,700 in Social Services Relief funding to “protect homeless shelter staff and residents, expand rent support programming and create longer-term housing solutions.”

At the meeting in May, Treasurer/Acting CAO Ian Davey said that additional reviews of financial impact to the Town would be a good idea at approximately 2 month intervals.  This could probably now best be done in conjunction with work to prepare the 2021 budget.  Now that we have a better idea of the Covid-19 impact and its impact, and we have visibility of what upper tier Government support will be, a realistic budget should be possible. And at least Municipal taxes should be zero or low increases with no reduction in services.


Previous Posts

Press Release

Print Article: 


Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
3 years ago

Any contribution to a Municipal operating deficit forecast is well received, but, it’s really a drop in the bucket given how wildly wrong the Gov’t was in their predictions of the illness and how extensive the economic shutdown was.
a)The Federal Health officials predicted 30-70% of Canadians would become ill via C19 by now. The real number is 0.3% (lower in Northumberland…)
b) The number of deaths per 100,000 residents in 2020 is 24 for C19 where in a normal year, 23 per 100,000 die from Flu/Pneumonia.

Our community continues to do a good job minimizing cases and tolerating imposed restrictions, –in consideration–both the Feds and the Province have to take more fiscal responsibility for the shutdown.

Reply to  Dunkirk
3 years ago

How many people would’ve got sick and die if we didn’t take Extreme measures ?
It could have been hundreds of thousand people

Reply to  Dunkirk
3 years ago

You cannot compare flu/pneumonia deaths to covid numbers as covid are actual reported numbers whereas F/P numbers are based on CDC estimates. F/P deaths are not reported.

Reply to  Kyle
3 years ago

We also should not compare Covid to the Spanish flu of 1918-1920 however it doesn’t stop the comparisons from being made from time-to-time – just so long as it aligns with the fear narrative.

Reply to  Rob
3 years ago

Spanish flu comparison? I have not seen Dr Tam or any other Provincial Health official making that comparison. Maybe just on your fake news anti mask sites.